Report Finds Problems With NJ Gay Unions
Just came across this online. Similarities indeed with our own Colley report here in Ireland.
Report Finds Problems With NJ Gay Unions
By GEOFF MULVIHILL
MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. (AP) — A commission established to study same-sex civil unions in New Jersey has found in its first report that civil unions create a "second-class status" for gay couples, rather than giving them equality.
The report stops short of recommending that the state allow gay marriage. But it does find that gay couples in Massachusetts, the only state that now allows same-sex marriage, do not experience some of the legal complications that those in New Jersey do.
The Associated Press obtained a copy of the initial report, which was scheduled to be made public Tuesday, the first anniversary of the state's first civil unions.
State lawmakers made New Jersey the third state to offer civil unions with a law adopted in 2006 in reaction to a state Supreme Court ruling that year that found gay couples were entitled to the same legal protections as married couples.
The civil union law sought to give gay couples those benefits, but not the title of marriage. As a part of the same law, the review commission was created to look into whether it was working.
Gay rights advocates say the civil unions do not deliver and have pledged to push lawmakers to vote to allow marriage. Gov. Jon S. Corzine has said he would be willing to sign such a bill into law but doesn't want the issue to be taken up before the presidential election in November.
The activists say civil unions, in practice, do not offer the legal protections that marriage does. The commission largely agreed with them.
Source & Cont'd:
Associated Press
Report Finds Problems With NJ Gay Unions
By GEOFF MULVIHILL
MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. (AP) — A commission established to study same-sex civil unions in New Jersey has found in its first report that civil unions create a "second-class status" for gay couples, rather than giving them equality.
The report stops short of recommending that the state allow gay marriage. But it does find that gay couples in Massachusetts, the only state that now allows same-sex marriage, do not experience some of the legal complications that those in New Jersey do.
The Associated Press obtained a copy of the initial report, which was scheduled to be made public Tuesday, the first anniversary of the state's first civil unions.
State lawmakers made New Jersey the third state to offer civil unions with a law adopted in 2006 in reaction to a state Supreme Court ruling that year that found gay couples were entitled to the same legal protections as married couples.
The civil union law sought to give gay couples those benefits, but not the title of marriage. As a part of the same law, the review commission was created to look into whether it was working.
Gay rights advocates say the civil unions do not deliver and have pledged to push lawmakers to vote to allow marriage. Gov. Jon S. Corzine has said he would be willing to sign such a bill into law but doesn't want the issue to be taken up before the presidential election in November.
The activists say civil unions, in practice, do not offer the legal protections that marriage does. The commission largely agreed with them.
Source & Cont'd:
Associated Press
posted by John James at
3:59 PM
2 Comments:
Thanks for pointing that out. Marriage is a basic civil right that should be attainable by all Americans. For the truth about gay marriage, especially in Massachusetts, check out our trailer. Produced to educate & defuse the controversy it has a way of opening closed minds & provides some sanity on the issue: www.OUTTAKEonline.com
Cheers for the Comment Charlotte. I completly agree with what you are saying. Marriage is a Basic Civil right, but it is a civil right for all persons, regardless of their nationality. Have a look at our campaign which is ongoing in the Republic of Ireland, www.marriagequality.ie for some information on the Irish Context.
Rgds,
J.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home